Jonathan Meades. It is a cult of "puritanical, po-faced, censorious nothingness"" href="/post/2017/10/20/The-fate-of-artists-and-of-art-itself-is-in-the-hands-of-too-few-persons-who-share-kindred-tastes-and-cultish-dogma-says-lt;stronggt;Jonathan-Meadeslt;stronggt;-It-is-a-cult-of-puritanical-po-faced-censorious-nothingness.aspx" />

Incompatibilist (Nondeterministic) Theories of Free Will

[Revised entry by Randolph Clarke and Justin Capes on February 16, 2017. Changes to: Main text, Bibliography] To have free will is to have what it takes to act freely. When an agent acts freely -
Philosophy News image
[Revised entry by Randolph Clarke and Justin Capes on February 16, 2017. Changes to: Main text, Bibliography] To have free will is to have what it takes to act freely. When an agent acts freely - when she exercises free will - it is up to her whether she does one thing or another on that occasion. A plurality of alternatives is open to her, and she determines which she pursues. When she does, she is an ultimate source or origin of her action. So runs a familiar conception of free will....

Continue reading . . .

News source: Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy

blog comments powered by Disqus