In our newest “how can we help you?” thread, an anonymous postdoc asks:
A simple CV question: How, if at all, do you list supervision on your CV?
Should you list supervision at all? Does it matter whether it is MA or PhD supervision? Does it matter if you are chair or a secondary supervisor? Do you put it under teaching or in its own section? Do you give names of the students? Do you give the titles of their theses?
I ask because I am a postdoc at the moment with limited teaching experience on my CV. I am serving as secondary supervisor to two MA students. I wonder if I should include this in my teaching section and, if so, how I should do so (see above questions)?
Good questions! Another reader submitted the following reply:
All the distinctions matter. Have a sub-list for PhDs separating those you are the supervisor for, from those you serve on the committee of; a sub-list for MAs, again, separated. List it under teaching, unless you are a leader of a team or lab with post-docs as well, then have a separate heading for Supervision. Whatever you do do not exaggerate your role to beef up your teaching. It will backfire.
I’m curious whether other readers agree. It does seem to me that it’s good to list how much supervision one has done, as some job ads explicitly note supervision experience as a hiring priority. But, beyond that, I’m not sure. I’m also not sure whether it’s a good idea to list names of students, as in the US at least my understanding is that all academic information falls under federal FERPA privacy laws.
Anyone else have any helpful tips or insights?
Originally appeared on The Philosophers’ Cocoon Read More