![DailyOwl_thumb5_thumb_thumb_thumb_th[2]_thumb](http://www.philosophynews.com/wp-content/uploads/DailyOwl_thumb5_thumb_thumb_thumb_th%5B2%5D_thumb_4.png "DailyOwl_thumb5_thumb_thumb_thumb_th[2]_thumb") |
The Daily Owl says, “To conduct an argument in the traditional sense, it is essential that there be some common ground. Unless the participants agree on the premises, there is no point in trying to derive a conclusion.” (John Searle) |
| Little bits of wisdom from a small, pewter Otus |
 RSS Feed |
This is Part 4 of a 4-part series on the academic, and specifically philosophical study of disagreement. In Part 1...
This is Part 3 of a 4-part series on the academic, and specifically philosophical study of disagreement. In Part 1...
This is Part 2 of a 4-part series on the academic, and specifically philosophical study of disagreement. In Part 1...
This is Part 1 of a 4-part series on the academic, and specifically philosophical study of disagreement. In this series...
[Revised entry by Roman Frigg and Stephan Hartmann on April 2, 2025. Changes to: Main text, Bibliography] Models are of...
[Revised entry by Thomas Forster on April 2, 2025. Changes to: Main text, Bibliography] Quine’s system of axiomatic set theory,...
This “Philosophy and Race” course began somewhat accidentally due to my being a teaching assistant, then instructor, for a similar...
In the spring of 2024, I took a graduate seminar on Leibniz taught by Professor Sukjae Lee in the Department...
