“The error lies not only in the feeling “I am accountable”, but equally in that antithesis “I am not, but somebody has to be.” — This is, in fact, not true: the philosopher thus has to say, as Christ did, “judge not!” and the ultimate distinction between philosophical heads and the others would be that the former desire to be just, the others to be a judge.”
– Friedrich Nietzsche, Assorted Opinions and Maxims, 33
Read the full article which is published on Philosophy Bits (external link)
This is Part 4 of a 4-part series on the academic, and specifically philosophical study of disagreement. In Part 1...
This is Part 3 of a 4-part series on the academic, and specifically philosophical study of disagreement. In Part 1...
This is Part 2 of a 4-part series on the academic, and specifically philosophical study of disagreement. In Part 1...
This is Part 1 of a 4-part series on the academic, and specifically philosophical study of disagreement. In this series...
Let’s be honest. The last AI conference you attended was probably littered with ethical buzzwords (fairness, privacy, accountability, transparency, safety…)...
Two Truths Approach Each Other What is it to be oneself? Or to live authentically? Psychoanalysis was a first, in...
Patrick D. Anderson is an Associate Professor of Philosophy at Central State University and editor of the WikiLeaks Bibliography. His...
[Revised entry by Ingrid Robeyns and Morten Fibieger Byskov on April 17, 2025. Changes to: Main text, Bibliography] The capability...
