Since a groundbreaking 1968 report, vigorous debate has ensued regarding how we ought to conceptually define and clinically determine when a human being has died. At the conceptual level, debate centers upon whether a human being qua “person”—understood in a Lockean psychological sense—dies if they become irreversibly comatose or if a human being is essentially […]
Read the full article which is published on APA Online (external link)
This is Part 4 of a 4-part series on the academic, and specifically philosophical study of disagreement. In Part 1...
This is Part 3 of a 4-part series on the academic, and specifically philosophical study of disagreement. In Part 1...
This is Part 2 of a 4-part series on the academic, and specifically philosophical study of disagreement. In Part 1...
This is Part 1 of a 4-part series on the academic, and specifically philosophical study of disagreement. In this series...
Let’s be honest. The last AI conference you attended was probably littered with ethical buzzwords (fairness, privacy, accountability, transparency, safety…)...
Two Truths Approach Each Other What is it to be oneself? Or to live authentically? Psychoanalysis was a first, in...
Patrick D. Anderson is an Associate Professor of Philosophy at Central State University and editor of the WikiLeaks Bibliography. His...
[Revised entry by Ingrid Robeyns and Morten Fibieger Byskov on April 17, 2025. Changes to: Main text, Bibliography] The capability...
