Search
Search
Matthew Arnold thought Chaucer “lacked high seriousness.” But Shakespeare couldn’t have done it without him
Matthew Arnold thought Chaucer “lacked high seriousness.” But Shakespeare couldn’t have done it without him

Date

source

share

Matthew Arnold thought Chaucer “lacked high seriousness.” But Shakespeare couldn’t have done it without him . . .

Matthew Arnold thought Chaucer “lacked high seriousness.” But Shakespeare couldn’t have done it without him

Read the full article which is published on Arts and Letters Daily (external link)

More
articles

More
news

What is Disagreement?

What is Disagreement?

This is Part 1 of a 4-part series on the academic, and specifically philosophical study of disagreement. In this series...

Do refugees have obligations?

Do refugees have obligations?

From 'small boats' to the Mexican border, refugees fleeing conflict, persecution, or those seeking a better life dominate our headlines....

Asexuality and Epicureanism

Asexuality and Epicureanism

What makes sex desirable? Aren’t there lots of risks and downsides? Unless you’re trying to reproduce, why have sex at...