Search
Search
How to solve democracy’s polarisation problem
How to solve democracy’s polarisation problem

Date

source

share

Every election, regardless of the winner, ends with a nation divided. Old and young, men and women, rich and poor... elections divide us. But are elections really a necessary part of a democracy? Alexander Guerrero doesn't think so. In place . . .

Every election, regardless of the winner, ends with a nation divided. Old and young, men and women, rich and poor… elections divide us. But are elections really a necessary part of a democracy? Alexander Guerrero doesn’t think so. In place of elections, we should appoint our political officials by lottery. While such a claim may on the surface appear unrealistic or outright dangerous, we should remember that the jury system, vital to the carrying out of the rule of law, works in a similar way. Government by lottery has a vast history, and with strict frameworks in place to play roles comparable to judges and the prosecution/defence in the system of law, Guerrero argues, it just might work. And at least, he argues, it is better than our current system, in which we approach a political, and existential, precipice every four years – the precipice we approached last week. Here in 2024 in America, half of us threaten the other half (and possibly the world) with d…

Read the full article which is published on IAI TV (external link)

More
articles

More
news

What is Disagreement?

What is Disagreement?

This is Part 1 of a 4-part series on the academic, and specifically philosophical study of disagreement. In this series...

The Quality of Thought

The Quality of Thought

2024.11.6 : View this Review Online | View Recent NDPR Reviews David Pitt, The Quality of Thought, Oxford University Press,...