In the 21st century, terms considered marginal or colloquial are gaining unexpected cultural relevance. One of these is “brain rot”, a term originally used to describe the mental decline associated with boredom or excessive consumption of superficial entertainment. However, the concept has evolved to capture a broader and more pressing concern: the impact of the digital era on our ability to think, concentrate, and connect with the world meaningfully.

The rise of the term brain rot reflects a change in our collective perception of the relationship between technology, the content we consume, and our mental health. In this article, we’ll explore how this expression captures a contemporary reality, addressing its cultural and philosophical roots, its ethical implications, and why it’s essential to reflect on this phenomenon at a time when our humanity seems more connected yet more fragmented than ever.

What does brain rot mean?

The term brain rot is, basically, a powerful metaphor. It speaks to a kind of “mental rot” that many associate with passive consumption of content on the Internet: endlessly scrolling through social media, watching short videos with no apparent purpose, or consuming excessive amounts of low-quality entertainment. But can our brains really “rot”?

From a neuroscientific perspective, the human brain is designed to adapt to the environment in which it operates. This means that our daily activities shape our cognitive abilities. If we spend hours on activities that don’t stimulate critical thinking or creativity, it’s reasonable to argue that we limit our cognitive potential. Brain rot, then, isn’t so much a literal disease as a way of describing the mental atrophy that results from excessive and unreasonable use of technologies designed to capture our attention but not to enrich our minds. The popularity of brain rot as a concept is deeply established in the context of our times. We live in a hyperconnected society where digital platforms constantly compete for our time and attention. TikTok, YouTube Shorts, Instagram Reels, and other forms of short-viral content are just a few examples of how we’ve come to prioritize immediacy over depth.

From a philosophical perspective, this phenomenon can be analyzed through ​​cognitive consumerism, a term that encapsulates how our minds have become the new battlefield for the market. Jean Baudrillard, a French philosopher and sociologist, argued that we live in a society of simulations, where reality is replaced by representations that seem more real than reality itself. In this sense, the digital content we consume can be interpreted as a simulation that occupies our attention but rarely offers anything substantial. However, what’s most concerning isn’t just the quality of the content we consume but its impact on our ability to be present and engaged with the world. What happens when the constant need for ephemeral entertainment overshadows our sense of wonder, our capacity for deep reflection, and our connection with others?

But brain rot is not only a mental phenomenon; it also has a temporal and ethical dimension. In his essay “Theses on the Philosophy of History”[1], Walter Benjamin reflected on how modern times splinter our experience of the world, rendering us unable to perceive history as a coherent whole. Similarly, the economy of attention in the digital age fragments our time, dividing it into ever-smaller, easily monetizable intervals and, instead of spending time on meaningful activities (such as reading a book, reflecting on an idea, or simply being present with those around us) more people report feeling trapped in a cycle of compulsive content consumption. This raises ethical questions about how we value our time and whether we are truly living mindfully or simply allowing our attention to be exploited by Big Tech.

Is brain damage inevitable?

A crucial point of reflection is whether brain damage is an inevitable consequence of living in a digital society or whether there are ways to resist it. Here, philosophy can offer us tools to face this challenge. For example, the Aristotelian concept of eudaimonia—happiness, or human flourishing—invites us to consider what activities lead us to live a full life. According to Aristotle, human flourishing is achieved through virtue and reason, not fleeting pleasures or constant distractions.

Likewise, contemporary philosophers such as Byung-Chul Han have warned about the dangers of hyperconnectivity and overexposure. In The Burnout Society, Han describes how overstimulation and the constant demand for performance exhaust us mentally and emotionally. The metaphor of brain rot finds a disturbing echo: how far are we from becoming tired machines, incapable of thinking beyond the immediate? Although “brain rot” sounds pessimistic, it can also be a wake-up call. If we recognize that our current practices affect our mental and cognitive health, we can also look for ways to counteract this effect. Some strategies include:

Set limits on the use of technology: Stoicism, especially with Epictetus, reminds us to focus our attention on what we can control. This should include our relationship with technology. Practicing moderation can help us reclaim the time and attention we often give away thoughtlessly.

Promote critical thinking: Instead of passively consuming content, we can actively engage with it. Questioning what we see, seeking additional information, and, above all, reflecting on its real relevance.

Reconnect with meaningful activities: Read books, participate in philosophical debates or simply spending time in nature can be effective ways to counteract the impact of brain rot. This can not only stimulate our minds but also help us reconnect with valuable resources.

Promoting ethical technology design: If we think more broadly, we must advocate for technologies that respect our humanity rather than exploit it. This includes demanding transparency in how algorithms are designed and prioritizing user well-being over profit.

What does brain rot say about us?

The popularity of brain rot [2] is not an accident but rather a symptom of our times; it reflects collective anxieties about how we live, work, and think in a world increasingly mediated by screens. As we mentioned, it’s also an opportunity to reflect on what kind of life we ​​want to lead.

Philosophy teaches us that the meaning of life is not found in extremes but in balance. And although we live in a digital age that offers us infinite possibilities, it also comes with equal risks. It’s up to us to decide how we want to interact with this environment and what place we want to give to technology in our lives. We must understand that brain rot is not just a cultural or technological phenomenon; it’s a reminder of our fragility as human beings and the importance of protecting what makes us unique: our ability to think, create, and connect with others. Regaining control over our minds, therefore, is perhaps one of the most significant philosophical challenges of our time.

[1]“Theses on the Philosophy of History”, also known as “On the Concept of History”, is an essay written by Walter Benjamin between 1939 and 1940 in Paris, a few months before he committed suicide in Portbou, while fleeing persecution by the Gestapo.

[2]Bárcenas, D. (2024, December 4). “What does Brain Rot mean? The word of 2024, according to Oxford.” Sopitas. https://www.sopitas.com/noticias/brain-rot-palabra-2024-oxford-que-significa/

The post Brain Rot: Are We Rotting Our Minds in the Digital Age? first appeared on Blog of the APA.

Read the full article which is published on APA Online (external link)