Since a groundbreaking 1968 report, vigorous debate has ensued regarding how we ought to conceptually define and clinically determine when a human being has died. At the conceptual level, debate centers upon whether a human being qua “person”—understood in a Lockean psychological sense—dies if they become irreversibly comatose or if a human being is essentially […]
Read the full article which is published on APA Online (external link)
This is Part 4 of a 4-part series on the academic, and specifically philosophical study of disagreement. In Part 1...
This is Part 3 of a 4-part series on the academic, and specifically philosophical study of disagreement. In Part 1...
This is Part 2 of a 4-part series on the academic, and specifically philosophical study of disagreement. In Part 1...
This is Part 1 of a 4-part series on the academic, and specifically philosophical study of disagreement. In this series...
[Revised entry by Thomas Talbott on May 10, 2025. Changes to: Main text, Bibliography] Behind the various Christian ideas about...
[Revised entry by Edward Wierenga on May 10, 2025. Changes to: Main text, Bibliography] Omniscience is the property of having...
2025.05.4 : View this Review Online | View Recent NDPR Reviews Serene J. Khader, Faux Feminism: Why We Fall for...
Welcome to the APA Mini-Series Blog organized by the APA Committee on Professional Rights and Academic Freedom, formerly, the Committee on...
