Search
Search
Erich Fromm on Being Productive
Erich Fromm on Being Productive

Date

source

share

For Erich Fromm, true activity means to fully use one’s talents and abilities in order to grow as a person. The mere display of being busy is, in Fromm’s opinion, not a sign of productive work. Modern society, which relies . . .

For Erich Fromm, true activity means to fully use one’s talents and abilities in order to grow as a person. The mere display of being busy is, in Fromm’s opinion, not a sign of productive work. Modern society, which relies on hierarchy and alienated work, tends to favour busy-ness over productive activity.

This article is part of The Ultimate Guide to the Philosophy of Erich Fromm.

If you like reading about philosophy, here’s a free, weekly newsletter with articles just like this one: Send it to me!

“Activity in the modern sense refers only to behavior, not to the person behind the behavior. It makes no difference whether people are active because they are driven by external force, like a slave, or by internal compulsion, like a person driven by anxiety. It does not matter whether they are interested in their work, like a carpenter or a creative writer, or a scientist or a gardener; or whether they have no inner relation to and satisfaction in what they are doing, like the worker on the assembly line or the postal clerk.” — Erich Fromm, To Have Or To Be (1976)

This is the psychologist and philosopher Erich Fromm writing about what it really means to be an active person. For Fromm, being active does not mean being busy.

Erich Fromm on activity and busyness

Modern busyness (and business) is all too often only about showing off how busy one is, about “hustling,” which, interestingly, today has become a synonym for freelance work.

But how productive is such busyness really?

For Fromm, to be active…

… means to give expression to one’s faculties, talents, to the wealth of human gifts with which — though in varying degrees — every human being is endowed. It means to renew oneself, to grow, to flow out, to love, to transcend the prison of one’s isolated ego, to be interested, … to give. Yet none of these experiences can be fully expressed in words. (p.40)

In this sense, Fromm’s “activity” is similar to what Richard Taylor called “creativity,” and what Aristotle would call flourishing: the use of one’s mind and one’s talents, of one’s whole personality, in order to grow and become a better, richer person, one who is able to give more to others rather than take.

Richard Taylor on the Creative Life


Richard Taylor on the Creative Life

Richard Taylor (1919–2003) thought that it’s creativity that makes us …

Read the full article which is published on Daily Philosophy (external link)

More
articles

More
news

What is Disagreement?

What is Disagreement?

This is Part 1 of a 4-part series on the academic, and specifically philosophical study of disagreement. In this series...

Philip Goff’s Pan-Optimism

Philip Goff’s Pan-Optimism

Philosopher Philip Goff is omnipresent these days. Goff, who lectures on the philosophy of mind and consciousness at Durham University...