Search
Search
“If you are going to tell me what you predict I will do, then your prediction must take into account…”
“If you are going to tell me what you predict I will do, then your prediction must take into account…”

Date

source

share

“If you are going to tell me what you predict I will do, then your prediction must take into account the effect on me of knowing your prediction, because otherwise it will probably be wrong. Of course it can happen, in a specific kind of case, that knowing the sort of thing I am usually determined to do diminishes my freedom. If I see that I often give in to temptation, I might become discouraged, and fight against it even less hard. But there is no reason to think that this kind of discouragement would be the general result of understanding ourselves better. Or if there is, it must come from some pessimistic philosophy of human nature, not from the Scientific World View. If predictions can warn us when our self-control is about to fail, then they are far more likely to increase that self-control than to diminish it. Determinism is no threat to freedom.”

Christine M. Korsgaard, The Sources of Normativity

Originally appeared on Philosophy Bits Read More

More
articles

More
news

What is Disagreement?

What is Disagreement?

This is Part 1 of a 4-part series on the academic, and specifically philosophical study of disagreement. In this series...

Medieval Skepticism

Medieval Skepticism

[Revised entry by Charles Bolyard on January 9, 2025. Changes to: Main text, Bibliography] Overarching surveys of the history of...

Taming and Tolerating Uncertainty

Taming and Tolerating Uncertainty

Democracy is existential to its core, and the social question is key to its survival. Since large-scale transformations of society—including...