Search
Search
Logical Pluralism and Logical Consequence
Logical Pluralism and Logical Consequence

Date

source

share

2025.02.10 : View this Review Online | View Recent NDPR Reviews

Erik Stei, Logical Pluralism and Logical Consequence, Cambridge University Press, 2023, 219 pp., $110.00 (hbk), ISBN 9781108494663.

Reviewed by Roy T Cook, University of Minnesota–Twin Cities

In the philosophy of logic, the traditional view is monism—the idea that there is a single, univocal, everywhere-correct formal logic that captures, in some sense, logical validity in natural language. This view has been challenged by an increasing number of philosophers of logic, in an increasingly complex literature, involving innumerable variants on non-monist views. Erik Stei’s Logical Pluralism and Logical Consequence challenges this trend, defending logical monism against the rising pluralist tide.

Since this review will focus to a certain extent on aspects of Stei’s account with which I disagree, it is worth beginning with an explicit bit of praise: Logical Pluralism and Logical Consequence is excellent. Stei meticulously and charitably lays out extant arguments for logical pluralism, provides a novel, detailed, and extremely helpful framework…

Read More

Read the full article which is published on Notre Dame's Philosophical Reviews (external link)

More
articles

More
news

What is Disagreement?

What is Disagreement?

This is Part 1 of a 4-part series on the academic, and specifically philosophical study of disagreement. In this series...

Without Philosophy Einstein Said He Would Cave “Contributed Nothing”

Questioning the Doubting Game

Things are going well in Symbolic Logic. Students are mastering truth tables, and they’re symbolizing English sentences into our truth-functional...

Without Philosophy Einstein Said He Would Cave “Contributed Nothing”

Encouraging Students to Reflect

College courses, unlike most high school courses, require students to engage in a good deal of independent learning. What they...