Search
Search
Matthew Arnold thought Chaucer “lacked high seriousness.” But Shakespeare couldn’t have done it without him
Matthew Arnold thought Chaucer “lacked high seriousness.” But Shakespeare couldn’t have done it without him

Date

source

share

Matthew Arnold thought Chaucer “lacked high seriousness.” But Shakespeare couldn’t have done it without him . . .

Matthew Arnold thought Chaucer “lacked high seriousness.” But Shakespeare couldn’t have done it without him

Read the full article which is published on Arts and Letters Daily (external link)

More
articles

More
news

What is Disagreement?

What is Disagreement?

This is Part 1 of a 4-part series on the academic, and specifically philosophical study of disagreement. In this series...

Tommaso Campanella

Tommaso Campanella

[Revised entry by Germana Ernst and Jean-Paul De Lucca on April 17, 2025. Changes to: Main text, Bibliography] Tommaso Campanella...

Why Cicero Matters

Why Cicero Matters

2025.04.7 : View this Review Online | View Recent NDPR Reviews Vittorio Bufacchi, Why Cicero Matters, Bloomsbury Academic, 2023, 175pp.,...