New Books in Philosophy discusses this title with author Robert Pasnau. The book addresses questions like,
What was the scholastic metaphysical tradition of the later Middle Ages, and why did it come “crashing down as quickly and completely” as it did towards the end of the 17th Century? Why was the year 1347 a “milestone in the history of philosophy”? And why didn’t philosophy itself collapse right along with the scholastic framework?
Hear the interview here.
This is Part 4 of a 4-part series on the academic, and specifically philosophical study of disagreement. In Part 1...
This is Part 3 of a 4-part series on the academic, and specifically philosophical study of disagreement. In Part 1...
This is Part 2 of a 4-part series on the academic, and specifically philosophical study of disagreement. In Part 1...
This is Part 1 of a 4-part series on the academic, and specifically philosophical study of disagreement. In this series...
Babitz and Didion. Making sense of the contentious bond between "fastidious, frigorific, bony Joan" and "heedless, hot, voluptuous Eve"
To understand Bruno Latour you must grasp three facts: He was from a wine-growing family; he was from Burgundy; and...
When engaging with poetry, readers will often ask what a particular poem means. The implicit assumption, of course, is that...
2024.10.16 : View this Review Online | View Recent NDPR Reviews Blake Roeber, Political Humility: The Limits of Knowledge in...
/cdn.vox-cdn.com/uploads/chorus_image/image/70330087/DidionBabitzCalifornia02_Getty_Ringer.0.jpeg "Babitz and Didion. Making sense of the contentious bond between “fastidious, frigorific, bony Joan” and “heedless, hot, voluptuous Eve”")
