Search
Search
Scientific consensus needs dissent
Scientific consensus needs dissent

Date

source

share

We place high epistemic value on expert opinion and when it reaches a consensus, we may view this as settled science. But, writes Miriam Solomon, we should not equate expert opinion with certainty. While expertise is a valuable guide to . . .

We place high epistemic value on expert opinion and when it reaches a consensus, we may view this as settled science. But, writes Miriam Solomon, we should not equate expert opinion with certainty. While expertise is a valuable guide to decision-making, experts can be prone to human error too. Laypeople can, and should, critically evaluate how expert consensus is reached.  We live in an immense, complex world, and frequently benefit from guidance from those with more information and experience—people we regard as experts—to make sense of it. Along these lines, we often use expert consensus as an indicator of what is known, and expert disagreement as an indicator of what is uncertain. So, for example, earth scientist and historian Naomi Oreskes appeals to the record of peer-reviewed scientific publications on climate change to argue that the public should listen to the …

Read the full article which is published on IAI TV (external link)

More
articles

More
news

What is Disagreement?

What is Disagreement?

This is Part 1 of a 4-part series on the academic, and specifically philosophical study of disagreement. In this series...

Models in Science

Models in Science

[Revised entry by Roman Frigg and Stephan Hartmann on April 2, 2025. Changes to: Main text, Bibliography] Models are of...

Quine’s New Foundations

Quine’s New Foundations

[Revised entry by Thomas Forster on April 2, 2025. Changes to: Main text, Bibliography] Quine’s system of axiomatic set theory,...

Philosophy and Race, Cody Gomez

Philosophy and Race, Cody Gomez

This “Philosophy and Race” course began somewhat accidentally due to my being a teaching assistant, then instructor, for a similar...