Search
Search
Strategic ambiguity doesn’t work in a multipolar world
Strategic ambiguity doesn’t work in a multipolar world

Date

source

share

Engaging in foreign policy can be morally compromising for any power. But for the Arab world's relationship with the US, where consistency is key, this usually takes the form of an adherence to values. The US is compromised as it . . .

Engaging in foreign policy can be morally compromising for any power. But for the Arab world’s relationship with the US, where consistency is key, this usually takes the form of an adherence to values. The US is compromised as it picks and chooses its values to serve short-term goals, writes Mohammed Nosseir, such as strategic ambiguity over human rights violations in Saudi Arabia and Israel. While the permanence of Chinese and Russian governments give them an advantage when launching foreign policy projects, the US no longer has the privilege fence-sitting while its enemies make firm commitments in a multipolar worldThe relationship between the Arab world and the US is transactional, meeting some needs on each side without any meaningful sharing of values or long-term goals. The shifts in foreign policy driven by American elections are part of the problem, making America an unreliable partner for Arab states. The dilemma of the US’ foreign policy is…

Read the full article which is published on IAI TV (external link)

More
articles

More
news

What is Disagreement?

What is Disagreement?

This is Part 1 of a 4-part series on the academic, and specifically philosophical study of disagreement. In this series...

Recently Published Book Spotlight: Trans Philosophy

APA Member Interview, Peter Alward

Peter Alward is a Professor of Philosophy at the University of Saskatchewan. Originally from Halifax, Nova Scotia, he received his...

Recently Published Book Spotlight: Trans Philosophy

Science and the Public

I was awarded my Ph.D. in Philosophy in 2007. Early in my Ph.D. program, I mentioned to a more senior...