Semester after semester, I embarked on helping students to appreciate that morally relevant decisions are not a matter of personal preference, and I struggled to enable them to consider that moral judgments cannot simply be borrowed from an alleged moral authority – be it God, some political leader, or a famous media pundit. Then, one […]
Originally appeared on Blog of the APA Read More
This is Part 4 of a 4-part series on the academic, and specifically philosophical study of disagreement. In Part 1...
This is Part 3 of a 4-part series on the academic, and specifically philosophical study of disagreement. In Part 1...
This is Part 2 of a 4-part series on the academic, and specifically philosophical study of disagreement. In Part 1...
This is Part 1 of a 4-part series on the academic, and specifically philosophical study of disagreement. In this series...
[New Entry by Sam Cowling and Daniel Giberman on April 21, 2025.] [Editor’s Note: The following new entry by Sam...
[Revised entry by Farid Masrour, Andrew Brook, and Paul Raymont on April 21, 2025. Changes to: Main text, Bibliography, notes.html]...
Let’s be honest. The last AI conference you attended was probably littered with ethical buzzwords (fairness, privacy, accountability, transparency, safety…)...
