![DailyOwl_thumb5_thumb_thumb_thumb_th[2]_thumb](http://www.philosophynews.com/wp-content/uploads/DailyOwl_thumb5_thumb_thumb_thumb_th%5B2%5D_thumb_4.png "DailyOwl_thumb5_thumb_thumb_thumb_th[2]_thumb") |
The Daily Owl says, “To conduct an argument in the traditional sense, it is essential that there be some common ground. Unless the participants agree on the premises, there is no point in trying to derive a conclusion.” (John Searle) |
| Little bits of wisdom from a small, pewter Otus |
 RSS Feed |
This is Part 4 of a 4-part series on the academic, and specifically philosophical study of disagreement. In Part 1...
This is Part 3 of a 4-part series on the academic, and specifically philosophical study of disagreement. In Part 1...
This is Part 2 of a 4-part series on the academic, and specifically philosophical study of disagreement. In Part 1...
This is Part 1 of a 4-part series on the academic, and specifically philosophical study of disagreement. In this series...
What makes sex desirable? Aren’t there lots of risks and downsides? Unless you’re trying to reproduce, why have sex at...
Below is the audio recording of Nancy Fraser’s presidential address, “Is Capitalism Necessarily Racist?” given at the 2018 Eastern Division...
A new space age has begun. But how do we prevent geopolitical tensions on Earth from spilling over into space?...
Radheesh Ameresekere is a Ph.D. student at McGill University and a Masters candidate at Harvard Medical School. His interests are...
