![DailyOwl_thumb5_thumb_thumb_thumb_th[2]_thumb](http://www.philosophynews.com/wp-content/uploads/DailyOwl_thumb5_thumb_thumb_thumb_th%5B2%5D_thumb_4.png "DailyOwl_thumb5_thumb_thumb_thumb_th[2]_thumb") |
The Daily Owl says, “To conduct an argument in the traditional sense, it is essential that there be some common ground. Unless the participants agree on the premises, there is no point in trying to derive a conclusion.” (John Searle) |
| Little bits of wisdom from a small, pewter Otus |
 RSS Feed |
This is Part 4 of a 4-part series on the academic, and specifically philosophical study of disagreement. In Part 1...
This is Part 3 of a 4-part series on the academic, and specifically philosophical study of disagreement. In Part 1...
This is Part 2 of a 4-part series on the academic, and specifically philosophical study of disagreement. In Part 1...
This is Part 1 of a 4-part series on the academic, and specifically philosophical study of disagreement. In this series...
[Revised entry by Fiona Woollard, Frances Howard-Snyder, and Charlotte Unruh on July 8, 2025. Changes to: Main text, Bibliography, notes.html]...
If I were to tell you that you’re going to read something about the relationship between martial arts and philosophy,...
