Search
Search
The Literal-Nonliteral Distinction in Classical Indian Philosophy
The Literal-Nonliteral Distinction in Classical Indian Philosophy

Date

source

share

[Revised entry by Malcolm Keating on January 15, 2025.
Changes to: Main text, Bibliography]
Indian thinkers distinguish between literal and nonliteral meaning early in their history. They do so within different intellectual disciplines (śāstra-s), each broadly philosophical, but with varying emphases. Within the grammatical discipline, Yāska’s Semantic Explanation (Nirukta), an early (perhaps 6th century to 3rd century BCE) etymological treatise recognizes the difference between ordinary (laukika) and metaphorical language (upamā)….

Read the full article which is published on Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (external link)

More
articles

More
news

What is Disagreement?

What is Disagreement?

This is Part 1 of a 4-part series on the academic, and specifically philosophical study of disagreement. In this series...

Scriptum in Metaphysicam

Scriptum in Metaphysicam

2025.04.2 : View this Review Online | View Recent NDPR Reviews Richard Rufus of Cornwall. Scriptum in Metaphysicam, Rega Wood,...

Propositions: Ontology and Logic

Propositions: Ontology and Logic

2025.04.1 : View this Review Online | View Recent NDPR Reviews Robert Stalnaker, Propositions: Ontology and Logic, Oxford University Press,...