Search
Search
“Voluntarists try to explain normativity in what is in some sense the most natural way: we are…”
“Voluntarists try to explain normativity in what is in some sense the most natural way: we are…”

Date

source

share

“Voluntarists try to explain normativity in what is in some sense the most natural way: we are subject to laws, including the laws of morality, because we are subject to lawgivers. But when we ask why we should be subject to those lawgivers, an infinite regress threatens. Realists try to block that regress by postulating the existence of entities — objective values, reasons, or obligations — whose intrinsic normativity forbids further questioning. But why should we believe in these entities? In the end, it seems, we will be prepared to assert that such entities exist only because — and only if — we are already confident that the claims of morality are justified.”

Christine M. Korsgaard, The Sources of Normativity

Originally appeared on Philosophy Bits Read More

More
articles

More
news

What is Disagreement?

What is Disagreement?

This is Part 1 of a 4-part series on the academic, and specifically philosophical study of disagreement. In this series...

Daoism

Daoism

[New Entry by Chad Hansen on April 19, 2025.] Chinese Daoism is a Chinese philosophy of natural practice structured around...

Valuation Pipelines in AI

Valuation Pipelines in AI

Let’s be honest. The last AI conference you attended was probably littered with ethical buzzwords (fairness, privacy, accountability, transparency, safety…)...

Valuation Pipelines in AI

Life as a Flow

Two Truths Approach Each Other What is it to be oneself? Or to live authentically? Psychoanalysis was a first, in...