Search
Search
“Voluntarists try to explain normativity in what is in some sense the most natural way: we are…”
“Voluntarists try to explain normativity in what is in some sense the most natural way: we are…”

Date

source

share

“Voluntarists try to explain normativity in what is in some sense the most natural way: we are subject to laws, including the laws of morality, because we are subject to lawgivers. But when we ask why we should be subject to those lawgivers, an infinite regress threatens. Realists try to block that regress by postulating the existence of entities — objective values, reasons, or obligations — whose intrinsic normativity forbids further questioning. But why should we believe in these entities? In the end, it seems, we will be prepared to assert that such entities exist only because — and only if — we are already confident that the claims of morality are justified.”

Christine M. Korsgaard, The Sources of Normativity

Originally appeared on Philosophy Bits Read More

More
articles

More
news

What is Disagreement?

What is Disagreement?

This is Part 1 of a 4-part series on the academic, and specifically philosophical study of disagreement. In this series...

Relational Quantum Mechanics

Relational Quantum Mechanics

[Revised entry by Carlo Rovelli on February 4, 2025. Changes to: Main text, Bibliography] Relational Quantum Mechanics (RQM) is the...

The Philosophy of Computer Science

The Philosophy of Computer Science

[Revised entry by Nicola Angius, Giuseppe Primiero, and Raymond Turner on February 3, 2025. Changes to: Main text, Bibliography] The...