Search
Search
Words do not refer to reality
Words do not refer to reality

Date

source

share

We tend to think that words refer to things in the world. We believe words latch on to parts of reality, and that these connections are the fundamental source of linguistic meaning. But linguist and philosopher Paul Pietroski argues this . . .

We tend to think that words refer to things in the world. We believe words latch on to parts of reality, and that these connections are the fundamental source of linguistic meaning. But linguist and philosopher Paul Pietroski argues this is a mistake and offers an alternative approach to meaning. Words do not refer to things, Pietroski argues, and meaning is instead determined by the construction of complex concepts from simpler ones. Many animals can think about things. A horse can think intently about an apple that it sees in your hand. Humans can think and talk about lots of things that we can’t perceive. Consider dinosaurs, Shakespeare, the Earth’s metallic inner core, fairness, nuclear fusion, and next week. How can our minds reach so far, with such ease? Words surely help. But how?A typical child acquires thousands of words. Acquiring ‘apple’ usually involves thinking about an apple that someone is talking about; but it’s hard to see how we could…

Read the full article which is published on IAI TV (external link)

More
articles

More
news

What is Disagreement?

What is Disagreement?

This is Part 1 of a 4-part series on the academic, and specifically philosophical study of disagreement. In this series...

Hume on Religion

Hume on Religion

[Revised entry by Paul Russell and Anders Kraal on November 15, 2024. Changes to: Main text, Bibliography] David Hume’s various...