Search
Search
“If we agree that mentalistic explanations would not have arisen if our hardware had been more…”

Date

source

share

“If we agree that mentalistic explanations would not have arisen if our hardware had been more perspicuous, that will be enough to make the mind-body distinction pragmatic rather than ontological. That, in turn, is enough to reconcile us to the . . .

“If we agree that mentalistic explanations would not have arisen if our hardware had been more perspicuous, that will be enough to make the mind-body distinction pragmatic rather than ontological. That, in turn, is enough to reconcile us to the fact that we may never get a neurophysiological account of what is going on inside us which is as perspicuously related to psychological states as the engineer’s account of how the hardware “realizes” the computer’s program.”

Richard Rorty, Philosophy and the Mirror of Nature

Read the full article which is published on Philosophy Bits (external link)

More
articles

More
news

Ludwik Fleck

[Revised entry by Wojciech Sady on December 18, 2025. Changes to: Main text, Bibliography] In the 1930s, Ludwik Fleck (1896...