![DailyOwl_thumb5_thumb_thumb_thumb_th[2]_thumb_thumb](http://www.philosophynews.com/wp-content/uploads/DailyOwl_thumb5_thumb_thumb_thumb_th%5B2%5D_thumb_thumb_4.png "DailyOwl_thumb5_thumb_thumb_thumb_th[2]_thumb_thumb") |
The Daily Owl says, “We do not regard our actions and our character merely as fortunate or unfortunate episodes—though they may also be that. We cannot simply take an external evaluative view of ourselves—of what we most essentially are and what we do. Those acts remain ours and we remain ourselves, despite the persuasiveness of the reasons that seem to argue us out of existence.” (Thomas Nagel) |
| Little bits of wisdom from a small, pewter Otus |
 RSS Feed |
This is Part 4 of a 4-part series on the academic, and specifically philosophical study of disagreement. In Part 1...
This is Part 3 of a 4-part series on the academic, and specifically philosophical study of disagreement. In Part 1...
This is Part 2 of a 4-part series on the academic, and specifically philosophical study of disagreement. In Part 1...
This is Part 1 of a 4-part series on the academic, and specifically philosophical study of disagreement. In this series...
[Revised entry by Roman Frigg and Stephan Hartmann on April 2, 2025. Changes to: Main text, Bibliography] Models are of...
[Revised entry by Thomas Forster on April 2, 2025. Changes to: Main text, Bibliography] Quine’s system of axiomatic set theory,...
This “Philosophy and Race” course began somewhat accidentally due to my being a teaching assistant, then instructor, for a similar...
In the spring of 2024, I took a graduate seminar on Leibniz taught by Professor Sukjae Lee in the Department...
